Courts to Voters: Democrat Election Fraud Is ‘Too Big to Fail’
Article subtitle:
We will not have another fair election in our country. There is no “next time.”
Article publisher:
American Greatness
Article date:
14 December 2020
Article category:
National News
Medium
Article Body:
The following article focuses on obvious failure of the courts to address 2020 election fraud. Another perspective is that while the courts have failed the Republic, the primary Constitutional responsibility lies with state legislators and Electoral College electors. See this article summary: Timing of the Electors - We Don't Need SCOTUS to Win, by James Arlandson, American Thinker, December 12, 2020
The courts have spoken, one after another. Some 74 million Americans have been denied our day in court. The Democrats’ crime of stealing a presidential election is too big to fail....
Our judges tell us that ruling fraudulent ballots invalid would “disenfranchise” millions of voters. These are political statements. They are pusillanimous statements. They are not legal statements.
Upending an election has no precedent, we are told. But stealing a presidential election on this scale has no precedent, either. The courts are saying that if election crimes are so consequential, they require a politically consequential act to be redressed, then no redress is allowed....
... the Supreme Court tells us our state attorneys have no standing to protect our votes.
The evidence will not be heard in court. We cannot see the evidence formally submitted, discovery allowed, or 500 sworn testimonies of wrongdoing examined....
When those charged with defense of our laws will not defend them, the fraud will become institutionalized....
We will not have another fair election in our country. There is no “next time.”