California GOP Lost 7 of 14 House Seats AFTER ELECTION DAY — by ‘Ballot Harvesting’ (VIDEO)

Article CAIRCO note: 
Ballot harvesting is illegal in most states.
Article publisher: 
Gateway Pundit
Article date: 
3 December 2018
Article category: 
National News
Tags: 
election
Democrat
Article link: 
Excerpts are included below - read the original complete article
Medium
Article Body: 

... California lost 7 of its 14 Republican House seats this election cycle.

This was after the state legislature passed “ballot harvesting” laws. Ballot harvesting is illegal in most states. In Texas, New York and Pennsylvania they arrest people for ballot harvesting....
 
But in California they passed a law two years ago that makes it legal.
 
The GOP Lost 7 of 14 House Seats by Ballot Harvesting this year —
 
The seats were lost AFTER ELECTION DAY!...

The Daily Caller has more on this outrageous practice used by Democrats....

 

 

Related

The stomach-turning 'ballot-harvesting' that enabled Democrats to walk off with California, American Thinker, December 2, 2018.

 
... When planning for the November 2018 election, California’s Democrats didn’t just aim to pad their supermajority in the State Legislature. They weren’t going to be satisfied with a sweep of every elected state position, including governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, attorney general, controller, treasurer, insurance commissioner, and superintendent of public instruction. They knew they could do that, but they aimed higher. They were bent on eliminating every Republican congressman they possibly could, and they did pretty well in that....
 
The way they did this was to pass laws designed to rig the system.
 

Three laws in particular combined to stack the deck against Republicans. First came the Motor Voter law. This meant that as soon as any California resident acquired or renewed his driver’s license or state ID, he would be registered to vote automatically. Second, the state legislature authorized counties automatically to send absentee ballots to voters, even if they had not requested those ballots. Third, the rules governing ballot custody were changed so that anyone could turn in absentee ballots, not just the actual voter....

 

Article final link: 
The above article contains excerpts - we encourage you to read the complete original article
The CAIRCO Report
Advocating for the rights of future generations of Americans.
Our primary focus includes issues of Western Civilization, American sovereignty, sustainability,
and the environmental and societal consequences of unending immigration-driven population growth.
This website is a project of Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform (CAIRCO) - founded in the mid 1990s.
Copyright 1995-2024 Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform
Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues related to mass immigration and the transformation of America. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/108, https://www.law.cornell.edu/treaties/berne/10.html, and https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fair_use. In order to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.