Forced Replacement Migration
Every country has the right - and indeed the responsibility - to stabilize its population. Mass immigration is driving populations of Western nations to increase exponentially. Indeed, mass immigration is driving America's population to double within the lifetime of children born today.
Mass immigration is fundamentally altering the demographic makeup of Western nations, and is destroying social and national cohesiveness. A country comprised of squabbling nationalities will be easier to govern by globalist elites. Yet:
Who is pushing the Great Replacement?
The Great Replacement was promoted in the year 2000 UN article: Replacement Migration. Here are excerpts from its conclusion:
Replacement migration refers to the international migration that would be needed to offset declines in the size of a population, declines in the population of working age as well as to offset the overall ageing of a population.
This replacement migration study focuses its investigation on the possible effects of international migration on the population size and age structure of a range of countries that have in common a fertility pattern below the replacement level. In the absence of migration, all countries with fertility below replacement level will see their population size start declining at some point of time in the near future, if it is not already the case today...
One of the major consequences of population aging is the reduction in the ratio between the population in working-age group 15-64 years and the population 65 years or older, i.e., the potential support ratio (PSR)...
However, if retirement ages remain essentially where they are today, increasing the size of the working-age population through international migration is the only option in the short to medium term to reduce the declines in the potential support ratio...
In the absence of migration, the size of the working-age population declines faster than the overall population. As a result of this faster rate of decline, the amount of migration needed to prevent a decline in the working-age population is larger than that for the overall population...
The new challenges being brought about by declining and ageing populations will require objective, thorough and comprehensive reassessments of many established economic, social and political policies and programmes... Critical issues to be addressed in those reassessments would include... policies and programmes relating to international migration, in particular replacement migration, and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.
It's blatantly obvious that the UN's position expressed in this paper is to espouse nation-destroying replacement migration as a solution to the economic consequences of declining native populations. This myopic viewpoint completely ignores the social, national, and environmental consequences of increasing population via replacement migration.
As Prof. Al Bartlett has astutely stated:
Can you think of any problem in any area of human endeavor on any scale, from microscopic to global, whose long-term solution is in any demonstrable way aided, assisted, or advanced by further increases in population, locally, nationally, or globally?
Unlimited population growth cannot be sustained; you cannot sustain growth in the rates of consumption of resources. No species can overrun the carrying capacity of a finite land mass. This Law cannot be repealed and is not negotiable.
Updates on the Invasion of Europe