Muslim Massacre in New Zealand: Predictable and More to Come
Samuel P. Huntington, in his book, Clash of Civilizations, made the cogent point that mixing cultures leads to violent clashes among different religions, ethnic groups and languages.
Last week, an angry Australian in New Zealand massacred Muslims in two different mosques with the vengeance of a jihadist right out of the playbook from the Paris, France massacres, along with the Brussels, Belgium explosions and Nice, France killings along with Charlie Hebdo executions.
With clashing cultures and incompatible religions being imported into Canada, America and Australia—little wonder that more such violent reactions don’t occur more often. Fact: Islam intends to dominate the world. Their Quran mandates violence in that pursuit.
In America, our leaders imported 3.5 million Muslims, which led to San Bernardino Christmas killings, Orlando, Florida gay nightclub massacre, Fort Lauderdale killings, St. Cloud, Minnesota stabbings, 3,000 deaths at 9/11 site in New York City, along with an average of 25 honor killings annually of Muslim women in the USA and the insane assault and battery of over 500,000 women subjected to the brutality of female genital mutilation. (Source: Ass’t District Attorney Ed O’Callihan, DHS, Feb 2, 2018, press briefing)
In other words, when you mix a 6th century brutal and violent religion into first world countries, at some point, you force a response.
Remark on social media:
Along with “building too many Mosques” in Western Host countries & forcing their Kill-Joy Islam & their boring way of life upon host countries & proposing of “barbaric Sharia,” contribute further to Muslim hatred & also they never ever assimilate.
See, Muslims run away from their “Islamic Shit-Holes,” to western countries, for a good life….but when they settle down, they try to convert their Western host countries into the same “Islamic Hell-Holes,” they ran away from in the first place!”
Because of 9/11, most Americans feel queasy when they see a woman in a head scarf or a man in a white dress and cap. It brings them back to that brutal day in New York City when Muslim jihadists killed 3,000 people in the Twin Towers.
Additionally, Americans become a bit nervous, if not outraged when they hear Islamic leaders proclaim:
Other Muslim leaders proclaim, “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” Omar Ahmed, director of Council on American Islamic Relations.
Historian Andre Servier said:
In other words, Muslims themselves tell Western countries their intentions to conquer. Historians give greater understandings of the intentions of the Quran, but Western leaders fail to comprehend the point-blank intentions of Muslims in their countries. Thus, you see the devolvement and destruction of European, Canadian, American, New Zealand and Australia civilizations.
Our freedom of speech faces censoring by Muslims. Last week, Judge Jeanine Pirro suffered censoring because CAIR didn’t like the judge’s pointing out that House Member Muslim Omar remains vehemently anti-Jewish and wears a hijab mandated by the Quran that she swore on to become a member of the US House of Representatives. Unfortunately, everything in the Quran counters everything in U.S. Constitutional Law. Additionally, the Quran mandates destruction of America, thus, Omar should be tried and deported back to Somalia for treason.
While New Zealand’s leaders imported Muslims, they saw an uptick in honor killings, female genital mutilation, religious confrontations and severe unease among the Kiwi populace. I’ve traveled extensively over there. Nobody wants, likes or needs Muslim immigrants.
Huntington made it very clear as to the violence of mixing cultures and incompatible religions:
Of little note last week, Nigerian Muslims slaughtered 125 Christians. Not a word by the main stream media!
As Western countries import more Moslems, their leaders guarantee more religious, linguistic and cultural confrontations, especially from Islam and Sharia Law. Moslems NEVER integrate into host countries. Take a trip to Detroit, Michigan or Minneapolis, Minnesota or Miami, Florida. Those cities morphed into foreign countries with no intention of ever assimilating into America.
One reader from Florida wrote me:
That’s why, as America adds another 140 million people from all over the world by 2050—it signs its own death warrant as an intact, peaceful, cohesive and thriving civilization. Instead, America faces more San Bernardino’s, Orlando’s, St. Cloud’s, Fort Hood’s, beheadings, be-handings, honor killings, Sharia Law, female genital mutilation, gay killings, fatwa’s and a host of Quran related violence. Violence remains the nature of Islam as it gallops toward dominance wherever it exists.
Only viable solution: immediate cessation of all immigration into the United States and Canada.
Related
Learn more about Islamic terrorism and Islamic conquest - CAIRCO research.
Who Spawned the Christchurch Killer?, by Patrick J. Buchanan, VDare, March 18, 2019:
... Now, there are no excuses, or defenses, for what happened in Christchurch. But there is an explanation.
All peoples to some degree resent and resist the movement of outsiders into their space. Some migrants are more difficult than others to assimilate into Western societies. European nations that had not known mass migrations for centuries were especially susceptible to a virulent reaction, a backlash.
Our leaders in the 1920s understood this and took steps to halt the migrations until those who had come could be assimilated, and, in a word, Americanized. It worked. By 1960, we were a united people.
Then, without the people's consent, the great experiment began:
America's doors were thrown open to peoples of every religion, race, culture and creed, to create a different nation that mirrored all mankind in its diversity, in Ben Wattenberg's phrase, a universal nation.
The problem: A universal nation is a contradiction in terms. A nation of all races, religions and tribes had never before existed.
The liberal democracies that embraced this ideology, this idea, are at war with human nature, and are losing this war to tribalism and authoritarianism....
Christians living in a Muslim country ‘143 times more likely’ to be killed by a Muslim than vice versa, March 18, 2019, Voice of Europe.
All the religious massacres you didn’t hear about over the past year have one thing in common… Christians were killed instead of Muslims, D.C. Clothesline, March 19, 2019.
New Zealand Attack Shows Us That Tribal Score-Settling Has Infected the West, By Richard Fernandez, PJ Media, March 19, 2019:
The attack on the mosques, like Anders Breivik's murderous rampage in idyllic Norway, happened in New Zealand, ironically rated in 2017 the safest country in the world after Iceland. It's a sad reminder that no place is exempt from ethnic conflict.... Wherever populations mix under pressure there's the potential for volatility....
But ethnic conflict in the Third World is a dog-bites-man story. What is new about the New Zealand attack is that the terrible plague of tribal score-settling and grievance mongering is now in the West. Not that the West is a stranger to ethnic conflict: the Holocaust, Generalplan Ost, Holodomor, and Polish and Armenian genocides are bywords in themselves. But it was widely assumed that WW2 had seen these off (until Bosnia) and the risks of multiculturalism and mass immigration could be mitigated by immunosuppressive strategies like political correctness and demographic replacement, of which the EU project is a textbook example.
Yet events since 2016 indicate that this strategy is failing despite the suppressants. Pressure from the root causes — whether European colonialism, Islamic slave trading, 9/11, the War on Terror, multiculturalism, populism — are burning through the medication. The old devils are on the loose and the problem is what to do now. One option is to deliver even higher doses of political correctness and demographic replacement. But perhaps the absolute worst thing politicians can do is respond by collecting guns, imposing hate speech restrictions, and announcing open borders. In the current atmosphere of distrust toward authority, such actions can destroy the only asset a state faced with ethnic conflict has: the public belief that it is above the fray and won't sell anyone out. That quantity can itself run out and therein lies the danger....